'Stop the war' is a pro-occupation, pro-imperialist dangerously untruthful phrase when used about Iraq today -

Edited version at 0225 Hrs GMT On Friday 27 July 2007

There is no 'war' on anyone declared by Iraq -Iraq has been racistly occupied by the imperialists fronted by GW Bush

By ©Muhammad Haque_

2020 Hrs GMT London Thursday 26 July 2007_

_The UK lobby trading as 'anti-war' is showing its true colour by following – in the sense of using without qualification – the racist phraseology and the racist language of the occupying imperialists


Their ‘political’ cousins across the ocean in the USA are essentially the same.

They too want to call it a war as far as their references to the people of Iraq under US-ed occupation is concerned.


These ‘antiwar’ warriors do not recognise the people of Iraq. In that particular too, they are as racist as their so-called targets of 'anti-warrior criticism', the likes of GW Bush and Tony Bliar


Most of the ‘anti-war’ lobby’s front men and women may appear as vocally strident opponents of ‘war’ but they are in essence contributing to the grand imperialist lie that the world [ And THE PARTS OF THE WORLD TODAY] under attack of imperialist occupations and land grabs and resource misappropriations and appropriations are as guilty as the perpetrators of these acts of crimes against humanity.

This is illustrated in and by the terminology, the language, the imagery deployed by these self-styled socialists who are bigger propagandists for the racist lying machine than they would admit when challenged on the facts of their behaviour as paraders of a war that is not there and the deniers of a deeper seated occupation and daily slaughter that is there .__

It is very remarkable that it keeps calling for an end to ‘the war’ meaning the occupation of Iraq. But it does not say ’occupation of Iraq’ as the central platform f the alleged campaign against the occupation and the violation of Iraq and all that those entail.

Why?

Because ‘war’ necessarily and in the usage today, includes the active assumption that the occupied party also waged war on the occupier or on the occupying powers or forces.


This changes the balance of labiality and responsibility.__It makes the victims, the targets almost as guilty as the perpetrators, the invaders, the occupiers….___It is time that those, including the UK’s George Galloway, stopped using ‘war’ when they refer to the Iraqi people and the Iraqi community in the context of the occupation of that country by GW Bush and the forces of evil that GW Bush represents, symbolises, even epitomises and identifies with and incites against the innocent people of Iraq and in Iraq…